A renewed political debate is emerging over Spain’s continued control of Ceuta and Melilla in North Africa as Madrid maintains strong criticism of Israeli policies in Gaza.
Ceuta and Melilla are Spanish autonomous cities located on Africa’s Mediterranean coast. Morocco claims both territories and describes them as occupied Moroccan lands, while Spain regards them as integral parts of its territory. The dispute has remained a longstanding source of tension between Madrid and Rabat.
The issue has gained fresh attention amid continuing diplomatic disagreements over the Gaza war. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez has been among the European leaders to take a strong position against Israel’s conduct in Gaza, while Spain has also maintained its own territorial claims in North Africa.
Critics have described this as a contradiction, arguing that European governments should apply consistent principles when discussing territorial disputes, occupation and the rights of populations. Commentators have particularly focused on Spain’s simultaneous support for Palestinian rights and its continued sovereignty over territories claimed by Morocco.
However, the territorial status of Ceuta and Melilla differs legally and historically from the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and the Spanish government rejects Morocco’s sovereignty claims over the two cities. Spain has exercised control over Ceuta since 1580, while Melilla has been under Spanish control for centuries.
The debate has also been complicated by allegations circulating online about the political financing of Spain’s left-wing government. Claims that Pedro Sánchez’s Socialist Party was funded by Venezuela’s government or Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps have not been established by the sources reviewed for this report. Earlier allegations concerning Venezuelan funding and Spain’s Podemos movement were publicly denied, while a 2025 audit commissioned by Spain’s ruling Socialist Party reportedly found no evidence of illicit or undeclared party financing.
Separate from those allegations, Iran’s Revolutionary Guard has publicly amplified Sánchez’s opposition to the U.S.-Israeli military campaign, including placing references to his statements on missiles, according to reports. That does not by itself establish financial or operational ties between Iran and the Spanish government.
The controversy illustrates the broader debate over consistency in international diplomacy, particularly when governments invoke principles of sovereignty, territorial integrity and civilian protection in different conflicts.
